University Supervisor Evaluation by Intern
Texas A&M University – Accelerate Online

Supervisor First: Supervisor Last:
Mentor First: Mentor Last:
Intern First: Intern Last:
Date:  

Please provide Accelerate Online with feedback on the quality of supervision by completing the brief instrument below and returning it. Respond to the following statements with a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
0=Not Observed; 1=Needs much improvement; 2=Adequate; 3=Very good


My University Supervisor:  
1.
Was accessible for questions, counseling, or conferences
2.

Observed and evaluated my teaching an adequate number of times (3-4) during each semester OR as I requested

3.

Gave constructive feedback, suggestions and conducted a conference (in person, by phone, or email) following observations

4.

Provided information and/or materials that were beneficial in enhancing my success and professional development

5.

Worked collaboratively and effectively with my school team (principal, mentor teacher, secretaries, aides, etc.) in supporting me

6.

Respected me as an individual and provided encouragement throughout the year

7.

If I had any problems or concerns related to teaching, I would not hesitate to discuss them with the University Supervisor

8.
Was available for special problems or concerns
9.
Was an efficient liaison between me and A&M personnel
10.

Allowed and recognized for differences in opinion and/or flexibility in teaching methods

11.

Showed genuine interest in my improvement and development as a teacher

12.
Demonstrated positive traits that facilitated my role as an intern
13.
Generally, was effective and supportive
14.
Had a thorough knowledge of procedures for the internship
15.
Guided me to use self-reflection and self-evaluation

Please add any additional comments: